31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A22MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks institutional risk appetite and lending constraints in financial markets. Provides insight into risk management strategies of investment advisers.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in risk tolerance for separately managed accounts. Reflects institutional perspectives on investment risk and market conditions.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions and investment advisers.
Historical Context
Used to assess overall financial sector risk perception and lending environment.
Key Facts
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Reflects institutional risk tolerance
- Important indicator of financial market sentiment
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks institutional willingness to take financial risks in separately managed accounts.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Why is risk appetite important?
A: Indicates overall market confidence and potential investment trends.
Q: How do institutions assess risk?
A: Through comprehensive analysis of market conditions and institutional capabilities.
Q: Can this metric predict market changes?
A: Provides early signals of potential shifts in financial market sentiment.
Related Trends
34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ34ICNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19B4MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ56B3ESNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ51CDCNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| C. Equities. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ78CISNR
32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ32ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Risk Appetite Survey (CTQ31A22MINR), retrieved from FRED.