31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A22MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks institutional risk appetite and lending constraints in financial markets. Provides insight into risk management strategies of investment advisers.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in risk tolerance for separately managed accounts. Reflects institutional perspectives on investment risk and market conditions.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions and investment advisers.
Historical Context
Used to assess overall financial sector risk perception and lending environment.
Key Facts
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Reflects institutional risk tolerance
- Important indicator of financial market sentiment
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks institutional willingness to take financial risks in separately managed accounts.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Why is risk appetite important?
A: Indicates overall market confidence and potential investment trends.
Q: How do institutions assess risk?
A: Through comprehensive analysis of market conditions and institutional capabilities.
Q: Can this metric predict market changes?
A: Provides early signals of potential shifts in financial market sentiment.
Related Trends
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51FDSNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ74A1TSNR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
CTQ11ESNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ70B3TSNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39GISNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ79EDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Risk Appetite Survey (CTQ31A22MINR), retrieved from FRED.