26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ26DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in insurance companies' negotiation strategies for pricing and terms. Indicates shifts in competitive landscape and cost management approaches.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend evaluates the intensity of negotiation efforts by insurance companies. It provides insights into market dynamics and strategic positioning.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of insurance industry negotiation practices and strategic approaches.
Historical Context
Used by insurers, investors, and regulators to understand market competitiveness.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of negotiation intensity
- Covers price and non-price term negotiations
- Reflects insurance market competitive landscape
FAQs
Q: What does CTQ26DSNR indicate?
A: It tracks changes in insurance companies' efforts to negotiate pricing and terms.
Q: Why are negotiation intensities important?
A: They reveal competitive pressures and strategic adaptations in the insurance market.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The data is collected and reported on a quarterly basis.
Q: Who finds this data useful?
A: Insurance executives, market analysts, and investors use this information for strategic insights.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Survey-based data can reflect perceptual changes and may have reporting biases.
Related Trends
10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ10ISNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40BDSNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ09RBUNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ50BDCNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19B52MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51FDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Insurance Negotiation Intensity (CTQ26DSNR), retrieved from FRED.