51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ51FDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

1.00

Year-over-Year Change

0.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Tracks changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence. Provides insights into market friction and contractual resolution dynamics.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This economic indicator measures shifts in commodity contract dispute characteristics. It helps assess market efficiency and contractual risk management.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection from financial and commodity market participants.

Historical Context

Used by regulators and traders to understand commodity market transaction challenges.

Key Facts

  • Indicates commodity market transaction complexity
  • Reflects potential contractual negotiation challenges
  • Signals market participant interaction dynamics

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator measure?

A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of commodity contract disputes over three months.

Q: Why are commodity contract disputes important?

A: They reveal market friction, transaction costs, and potential inefficiencies in commodity trading.

Q: How is this data collected?

A: Through surveys of financial and commodity market participants reporting dispute characteristics.

Q: Who uses this economic data?

A: Regulators, traders, and market analysts studying commodity market dynamics.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Typically reported quarterly with survey-based methodology.

Related News

Related Trends

50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

OTCDQ50DISNR

10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ10ISNR

21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| B. Etfs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ21BRBUNR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ31B32MINR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ31A4MINR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ31B42MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (ALLQ51FDCNR), retrieved from FRED.