20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ20DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures the reduction in negotiation intensity for institutional investors across mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Indicates changing investment strategies.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how institutional investors are modifying their approach to price and nonprice terms. It reflects broader market dynamics and investment sentiment.
Methodology
Quarterly survey capturing changes in institutional investor negotiation efforts.
Historical Context
Provides insights for financial analysts and investment strategists.
Key Facts
- Quarterly measurement of negotiation strategy
- Reflects institutional investor sentiment
- Indicates potential market adaptations
FAQs
Q: What does decreased negotiation intensity suggest?
A: It may indicate reduced market opportunities or increased investor caution.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Through a quarterly survey of institutional investors across various investment vehicles.
Q: Why track negotiation intensity?
A: It provides insights into institutional investor behavior and market conditions.
Q: What institutions are surveyed?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are included in the survey.
Q: How can investors use this information?
A: As a potential indicator of broader market trends and investment strategies.
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ40ADCNR
38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ38DCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74A3ECNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ79EDCNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56A3TCNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ13B7MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Institutional Negotiation Intensity (CTQ20DSNR), retrieved from FRED.