38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ38DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks corporate negotiation intensity for pricing and terms. Provides insight into business strategy and market competitive dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in corporate negotiation efforts across nonfinancial sectors. Indicates potential shifts in business procurement strategies.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from corporate decision-makers about negotiation practices.
Historical Context
Used by economists to assess business confidence and market interaction patterns.
Key Facts
- Reflects corporate procurement trends
- Indicates market competitive landscape
- Quarterly measurement of negotiation intensity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in nonfinancial corporations' negotiation efforts for pricing and contract terms.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported quarterly by surveying corporate decision-makers.
Q: Why are corporate negotiation trends important?
A: Provides insights into business confidence, market competition, and economic adaptability.
Q: How can businesses use this data?
A: Benchmark negotiation strategies and understand broader market dynamics.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: Represents surveyed perceptions and may not capture entire market complexity.
Related Trends
44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Equity Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ44BISNR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ42BISNR
48) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to TRS Referencing Non-Securities (Such as Bank Loans, Including, for Example, Commercial and Industrial Loans and Mortgage Whole Loans) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ48BRBUNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ21DDCNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ62A1ESNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ54ICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Term Negotiation Report (CTQ38DCNR), retrieved from FRED.