66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ66A1ESNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in maximum funding terms for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Provides insight into lending conditions and credit market flexibility.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures how funding terms have evolved for average clients in the non-agency RMBS market. It reflects broader credit market dynamics.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions reporting lending term adjustments quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by investors and policymakers to assess credit market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates slight easing of funding terms
- Reflects non-agency mortgage market conditions
- Quarterly reporting mechanism
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: It tracks changes in maximum funding amounts for average clients in non-agency RMBS markets.
Q: Why are RMBS funding terms important?
A: They indicate credit market flexibility and lending institution confidence.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: The series is typically updated on a quarterly basis.
Q: What does 'eased somewhat' mean?
A: Indicates a modest improvement in lending terms for average clients.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Investors, economists, and financial policy researchers monitor these trends.
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ39CICNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ25A32MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ66A3TCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ74B1TSNR
30) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ30RBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ62B3TSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding Terms (ALLQ66A1ESNR), retrieved from FRED.