39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ39CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume across trading REITs. Provides insight into financial sector transaction complexity and potential market tensions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute frequency in real estate investment trust trading activities. Helps analysts understand market friction and transactional challenges.
Methodology
Collected through survey-based reporting of financial institutions and trading platforms.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market transparency and operational risks.
Key Facts
- Indicates potential transactional friction in REIT markets
- Reflects complexity of financial instrument negotiations
- Signals potential regulatory or operational challenges
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes in trading REITs over three-month periods.
Q: Why are REIT disputes important?
A: They reveal potential market inefficiencies and transactional challenges in real estate investment trading.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically reported quarterly with current market conditions.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Financial analysts, regulators, and investment professionals monitor these dispute trends.
Q: What does an increase in disputes indicate?
A: Potential market stress, valuation disagreements, or increased transactional complexity.
Related Trends
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31A33MINR
1) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries (Such as Large Banking Institutions) Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ01DCNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66B2ECNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39GDCNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39GDSNR
10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ10ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ39CICNR), retrieved from FRED.