52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ52A4RBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
14.00
Year-over-Year Change
-26.32%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks funding terms for high-grade corporate bonds for average clients. Provides a snapshot of stable credit market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures corporate bond funding terms for typical market participants. It reflects overall credit market stability.
Methodology
Collected through survey of financial institutions tracking corporate bond lending conditions.
Historical Context
Used by economists to assess consistent credit market performance.
Key Facts
- Indicates stable bond funding terms
- Represents average client market segment
- Suggests consistent credit market conditions
FAQs
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' mean?
A: Indicates no significant shifts in corporate bond funding terms for average clients.
Q: Why track average client terms?
A: Provides broader market perspective beyond top-tier client segments.
Q: How frequently are these terms assessed?
A: Quarterly surveys capture evolving credit market dynamics.
Q: What implications does stability have?
A: Suggests consistent lending practices and steady credit market conditions.
Q: Who interprets this data?
A: Financial analysts, economists, and corporate finance researchers use these indicators.
Related Trends
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31A33MINR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ11RBUNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ74A1ECNR
20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ20DSNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31B43MINR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
ALLQ69MONR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Bond Funding Terms (ALLQ52A4RBUNR), retrieved from FRED.