78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| D. Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ78DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in lending dispute volumes for Agency RMBS collateral types. Provides insights into mortgage-backed securities market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks dispute volume trends in residential mortgage-backed securities lending. Indicates market sentiment and potential lending challenges.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions and lending markets.
Historical Context
Used by financial analysts to assess mortgage lending market conditions.
Key Facts
- Focuses on Agency RMBS lending disputes
- Indicates market lending conditions
- Measures dispute volume changes
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks changes in lending dispute volumes for Agency RMBS collateral types. Shows market lending challenges.
Q: Why are lending disputes important?
A: Indicate potential risks and challenges in mortgage-backed securities markets.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Appears to be a periodic survey measuring dispute volume trends.
Q: What are Agency RMBS?
A: Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities guaranteed by government agencies like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: What does 'Decreased Considerably' mean?
A: Indicates a significant reduction in lending dispute volumes for the specified period.
Related Trends
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ50BRBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19A12MINR
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ07DSNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ40EICNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| C. Pension Plans. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ21CDCNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ31A3MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Dispute Volumes (SFQ78DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.