50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ50BRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
14.00
Year-over-Year Change
-12.50%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Monitors changes in mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts. Provides critical insights into financial market interactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks volume changes in disputes related to interest rate contracts. It helps understand market friction and potential systemic risks.
Methodology
Collected through survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volumes.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers to assess financial market stability and contract management.
Key Facts
- Tracks interest rate contract dispute volumes
- Indicates potential market tension points
- Important for financial risk assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: It tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts over three months.
Q: Why are interest rate contract disputes important?
A: They can reveal potential stress in financial markets and contract management.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on financial institution surveys.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' indicate?
A: Suggests no significant shifts in dispute volumes during the reporting period.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Related Trends
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ66B2TCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ74B1TSNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ70A2TCNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66A1ECNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ70B3RBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19B72MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Interest Rate Contract Disputes (OTCDQ50BRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.