50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ50DDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for credit referencing corporates. Provides insights into financial contract dispute dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute volume in corporate credit referencing contracts. It reflects potential tensions in financial transactions.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking dispute trends.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market friction and contract management.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate contract dispute trends
- Measures dispute volume changes quarterly
- Reflects financial market transaction health
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for credit referencing corporates over three-month periods.
Q: Why are these dispute metrics important?
A: They provide insights into potential friction and challenges in corporate financial transactions.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: The data is typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Financial analysts, regulators, and corporate risk managers use this information for market assessment.
Q: What does 'decreased somewhat' indicate?
A: It suggests a modest reduction in dispute volume compared to previous reporting periods.
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ39EISNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ13A52MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66B1ECNR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Fx Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ42AISNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ25B7MINR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ79EDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ50DDSNR), retrieved from FRED.