79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ79EDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Indicates market resolution efficiency.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend tracks dispute resolution in non-agency RMBS markets. It reflects the complexity and efficiency of mortgage-backed securities transactions.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute resolution trends.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess mortgage market transparency.
Key Facts
- Focuses on non-agency RMBS
- Quarterly dispute resolution metric
- Indicates market transaction efficiency
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Residential mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why track dispute duration?
A: Dispute length impacts market liquidity, transaction costs, and overall market efficiency.
Q: How do disputes affect RMBS markets?
A: Prolonged disputes can reduce market confidence and increase transaction complexity.
Q: What causes RMBS disputes?
A: Valuation differences, collateral quality, and contractual interpretations can trigger disputes.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The survey is conducted quarterly, providing regular insights into market dispute trends.
Related News

Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...

S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...

U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...

U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...

U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...

U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ40BRBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40EDSNR
3) To What Extent Have Changes in the Practices of Central Counterparties, Including Margin Requirements and Haircuts, Influenced the Credit Terms Your Institution Applies to Clients on Bilateral Transactions Which Are Not Cleared?| Answer Type: To A Considerable Extent
CTQ03TACENR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ13A13MINR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ22ICNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78BDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, RMBS Dispute Trends (ALLQ79EDCNR), retrieved from FRED.