66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66B1ECNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in funding terms for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Provides critical insight into lending market conditions for most favored clients.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks maximum funding availability for top-tier clients in the non-agency RMBS market. It reflects broader lending environment dynamics.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection tracking changes in lending terms and conditions.
Historical Context
Used by investors and financial institutions to assess mortgage market liquidity.
Key Facts
- Indicates significant easing of funding terms
- Reflects favorable conditions for top clients
- Signals potential market expansion
FAQs
Q: What does 'eased considerably' mean?
A: Indicates significantly more favorable lending terms for top-tier clients in the non-agency RMBS market.
Q: Why are these funding terms important?
A: They reflect overall market liquidity and lending appetite for mortgage-backed securities.
Q: Who benefits from these easier terms?
A: Most favored clients with strong relationships and extensive market presence.
Q: How frequently are these terms updated?
A: Typically assessed and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: What impacts these funding terms?
A: Market conditions, client relationships, and overall economic environment influence lending terms.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19A6MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A32MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ62A2ESNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading REITs. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ40CDSNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62A3ECNR
53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ53RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding Terms (ALLQ66B1ECNR), retrieved from FRED.