26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ26DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Measures changes in insurance companies' efforts to negotiate transaction terms. Indicates shifts in market bargaining dynamics and competitive landscape.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This indicator tracks the intensity of negotiation efforts across insurance company transactions. It reflects market competitiveness and strategic positioning.

Methodology

Quarterly survey capturing negotiation intensity from financial institutions.

Historical Context

Used by analysts to assess market competitiveness and risk management strategies.

Key Facts

  • Captures negotiation strategy evolution
  • Provides qualitative market competitiveness insight
  • Reflects broader financial market dynamics

FAQs

Q: What does decreased negotiation intensity mean?

A: Suggests reduced competitive pressure or more stable market conditions in insurance transactions.

Q: How is negotiation intensity measured?

A: Through systematic surveying of financial institutions about their transaction approaches.

Q: Why track negotiation efforts?

A: To understand market dynamics, competitive landscape, and risk management strategies.

Q: What factors influence negotiation intensity?

A: Market conditions, regulatory environment, and overall economic uncertainty.

Q: How frequently does this data change?

A: Quarterly updates provide ongoing insights into market negotiation trends.

Related News

Related Trends

52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ52B4ESNR

40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ40ARBUNR

62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

SFQ62A1TCNR

20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ20DCNR

35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ35TSNR

6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ06B72MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Insurance Company Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ26DCNR), retrieved from FRED.