40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ40BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes with hedge funds. Provides insights into financial market interactions.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

Tracks hedge fund dispute characteristics over three-month periods. Indicates potential market friction and financial relationship dynamics.

Methodology

Collected through specialized financial sector survey of dispute characteristics.

Historical Context

Used by financial regulators to monitor hedge fund market interactions.

Key Facts

  • Tracks hedge fund dispute characteristics
  • Measures dispute duration changes
  • Indicates market relationship tensions

FAQs

Q: What specific disputes are measured?

A: Focuses on mark and collateral disputes with hedge funds over three-month periods.

Q: Why track hedge fund disputes?

A: Provides insight into financial market tensions and potential systemic risks.

Q: How is 'decreased considerably' defined?

A: Represents significant reduction in dispute duration or persistence compared to previous periods.

Q: Who would use this data?

A: Financial regulators, risk managers, and hedge fund researchers analyze these trends.

Q: What are the data limitations?

A: Represents reported disputes, may not capture all market interactions. Subjective reporting possible.

Related News

Related Trends

21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| A. Mutual Funds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

CTQ21ARBUNR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ25B52MINR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ25A42MINR

45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ45BRBUNR

70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ70A1ESNR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ31A2MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Hedge Fund Disputes (ALLQ40BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.