25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ25A42MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks internal treasury funding charges as a key factor in insurance company lending conditions. Provides insight into financial market risk assessment and funding dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in internal treasury funding costs for insurance companies. Reflects financial market liquidity and institutional lending practices.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions about lending conditions.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to understand credit market trends.
Key Facts
- Indicates internal funding cost pressures
- Reflects financial market risk assessment
- Important for understanding lending dynamics
FAQs
Q: What do internal treasury charges mean for insurance lending?
A: Higher internal charges can restrict lending and increase borrowing costs for insurers.
Q: How do treasury charges impact financial markets?
A: They reflect overall market liquidity and risk perception in the financial sector.
Q: Why are these charges important?
A: They indicate potential tightening or easing of credit market conditions.
Q: How often are these conditions assessed?
A: Typically surveyed quarterly to track ongoing market changes.
Q: Can these charges change quickly?
A: Yes, they can shift based on market conditions and institutional risk assessments.
Related News
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Home Sales Decline In August Due To High Prices
August 2023 U.S. Home Sales Decline Amid Rising Mortgage Rates and High Prices In August 2023, U.S. home sales experienced a notable decline, highl...
U.S. Trade Deficit Decreases As Businesses Anticipate Tariff Hikes
U.S. Trade Deficit Reaches Two-Year Low Amid Anticipated Tariff Hikes The recent announcement that the U.S. trade deficit has reached a two-year lo...
U.S. Natural Gas Storage Increases Due to Market Dynamics
Navigating Market Volatility: U.S. Natural Gas Storage Strategies and Trends Understanding the dynamics of the U.S. natural gas storage sector is c...
U.S. GDP Growth to Slow Due to Tariffs and Immigration Policies
How Tariffs and Immigration Policies Influence U.S. GDP Growth in 2025 The U.S. GDP is a fundamental gauge of the country's economic health. Recent...
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ40DISNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19B3MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B73MINR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Fx Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ42BDSNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66A4ECNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ50FRBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Insurance Company Lending Conditions (ALLQ25A42MINR), retrieved from FRED.