50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ50FRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
11.00
Year-over-Year Change
-15.38%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for commodity contracts. Provides insight into market transaction complexity and dispute resolution.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures the volume of disputes in commodity contract transactions. It reflects market transparency and contractual challenges.
Methodology
Collected through surveying financial institutions about contract disputes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and commodity market participants to assess transaction risks.
Key Facts
- Indicates market transaction complexity
- Reflects contractual dispute frequency
- Important for commodity market analysis
FAQs
Q: What are mark and collateral disputes?
A: These are disagreements about contract valuations and collateral terms in commodity trading transactions.
Q: Why track commodity contract disputes?
A: Tracking disputes helps understand market friction, risk, and potential areas for improved transaction processes.
Q: How often are these disputes measured?
A: Dispute volumes are typically surveyed and reported quarterly to capture market trends.
Q: Who monitors these contract disputes?
A: Regulators, commodity traders, and market analysts use this data to assess market health.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' mean?
A: It indicates stable dispute levels with no significant increase or decrease in contract conflicts.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ52A3TSNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ79EISNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39GDSNR
30) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ30TSNR
8) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ08ICNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ13A52MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (ALLQ50FRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.