Number of Large Domestic Banks That Tightened and Reported That Increase in Defaults by Borrowers in Public Debt Markets Was a Very Important Reason
SUBLPDCIRTDVLGNQ • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
7/1/2000 - 1/1/2011
Summary
Tracks the number of large domestic banks reporting increased defaults in public debt markets. Provides critical insight into banking sector credit risk and economic stress.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures bank perceptions of default risks in public debt markets. It serves as an early warning indicator of potential financial system challenges.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly bank lending survey of major financial institutions.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and economists to assess credit market conditions and potential systemic risks.
Key Facts
- Indicates potential credit market stress
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Early warning for financial system challenges
FAQs
Q: What does this metric indicate about bank lending?
A: It reveals banks' perceptions of default risks in public debt markets. Higher numbers suggest increased credit market stress.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: The data is collected quarterly through bank lending surveys.
Q: Why do economists track this metric?
A: It provides early insights into potential credit market and financial system challenges.
Q: Can this metric predict economic downturns?
A: It can be an early indicator of increasing financial stress and potential economic challenges.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: It represents bank perceptions and may not capture all market complexities.
Related Trends
Number of Domestic Banks That Eased and Reported That Improvement in Industry-Specific Problems Was Not an Important Reason
SUBLPDCIREINNQ
Number of Foreign Banks That Reported Stronger Commercial and Industrial Loan Demand and Reported That Increased Customer Investment in Plant or Equipment Was a Very Important Reason
SUBLPFCIRSEVNQ
Number of Large Domestic Banks That Reported Stronger Commercial and Industrial Loan Demand and Reported That Increased Customer Accounts Receivable Financing Needs Was a Very Important Reason
SUBLPDCIRSAVLGNQ
Number of Foreign Banks That Tightened and Reported That Reduced Tolerance for Risk Was a Somewhat Important Reason
SUBLPFCIRTRSNQ
Number of Large Domestic Banks That Eased and Reported That Improvement in Industry-Specific Problems Was a Somewhat Important Reason
SUBLPDCIREISLGNQ
Number of Foreign Banks That Eased and Reported That Reduced Concerns About Legislative Changes, Supervisory Actions, or Changes in Accounting Standards Was a Somewhat Important Reason
SUBLPFCIREESNQ
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Large Domestic Banks That Tightened and Reported That Increase in Defaults by Borrowers in Public Debt Markets Was a Very Important Reason (SUBLPDCIRTDVLGNQ), retrieved from FRED.