79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

SFQ79ERBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

15.00

Year-over-Year Change

7.14%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). The metric provides insights into the stability and dispute resolution processes in the mortgage lending and securities market.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The trend measures the consistency of dispute resolution in non-agency RMBS lending, which is critical for understanding market friction and transaction efficiency. Economists use this data to assess the smoothness of financial transactions and potential risks in mortgage-backed securities markets.

Methodology

Data is likely collected through surveys of financial institutions and market participants tracking dispute resolution timelines and patterns.

Historical Context

This indicator helps policymakers and regulators understand potential friction points in mortgage-backed securities markets and assess overall market liquidity and transparency.

Key Facts

  • Tracks dispute duration in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  • Provides insight into market transaction efficiency
  • Helps assess potential friction in mortgage lending markets

FAQs

Q: What are non-agency RMBS?

A: Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities are mortgage pools not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?

A: These disputes can indicate potential inefficiencies or risks in mortgage lending and securities markets, affecting overall market liquidity and transaction costs.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Typically, this type of indicator is updated quarterly to reflect recent market conditions and dispute resolution trends.

Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' mean?

A: This suggests that the duration and persistence of disputes have not significantly changed over the past three months, indicating stable market conditions.

Q: Who uses this data?

A: Financial regulators, economists, investment analysts, and mortgage market researchers use this data to understand market dynamics and potential risks.

Related News

Related Trends

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ37B4MINR

33) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ33DCNR

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ56A1ESNR

13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ13A1MINR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: First in Importance

ALLQ31A3MINR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ19A5MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [SFQ79ERBUNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged | US Economic Trends