79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ79ERBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
15.00
Year-over-Year Change
7.14%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). The metric provides insights into the stability and dispute resolution processes in the mortgage lending and securities market.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The trend measures the consistency of dispute resolution in non-agency RMBS lending, which is critical for understanding market friction and transaction efficiency. Economists use this data to assess the smoothness of financial transactions and potential risks in mortgage-backed securities markets.
Methodology
Data is likely collected through surveys of financial institutions and market participants tracking dispute resolution timelines and patterns.
Historical Context
This indicator helps policymakers and regulators understand potential friction points in mortgage-backed securities markets and assess overall market liquidity and transparency.
Key Facts
- Tracks dispute duration in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
- Provides insight into market transaction efficiency
- Helps assess potential friction in mortgage lending markets
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities are mortgage pools not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?
A: These disputes can indicate potential inefficiencies or risks in mortgage lending and securities markets, affecting overall market liquidity and transaction costs.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically, this type of indicator is updated quarterly to reflect recent market conditions and dispute resolution trends.
Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' mean?
A: This suggests that the duration and persistence of disputes have not significantly changed over the past three months, indicating stable market conditions.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Financial regulators, economists, investment analysts, and mortgage market researchers use this data to understand market dynamics and potential risks.
Related Trends
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ70A4TCNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62A2ECNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19A7MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66A1ECNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39DDSNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| G. Consumer Abs. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ79GDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [SFQ79ERBUNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025