39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39DDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes with mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Provides insights into institutional investment conflicts.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute volume among institutional investment entities. It reflects potential tensions in financial transactions.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions reporting dispute frequency.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investment professionals to assess market interactions.
Key Facts
- Tracks institutional investment dispute volumes
- Reflects potential market friction
- Important for understanding financial interactions
FAQs
Q: What types of disputes are measured?
A: Mark and collateral disputes involving mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments.
Q: How frequently are these disputes tracked?
A: Measured quarterly to identify trends in institutional interactions.
Q: Why are these dispute measurements important?
A: They indicate potential tensions or challenges in institutional investment environments.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes suggest?
A: Could indicate improved communication or clearer transaction protocols.
Q: How might these disputes impact investors?
A: Can potentially affect investment performance and institutional relationships.
Related Trends
73) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Cmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Somewhat
ALLQ73EONR
53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ53RBUNR
35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ35TSNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ52A3TSNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ43AICNR
44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Equity Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ44BDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Institutional Investment Disputes (ALLQ39DDSNR), retrieved from FRED.