78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ78BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bond lending. Provides critical insights into financial market transaction complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures dispute volumes in high-yield corporate bond lending transactions. It reflects market friction and operational challenges.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by risk managers and financial regulators to assess market transaction efficiency.
Key Facts
- Quarterly dispute volume metric
- Focuses on high-yield corporate bonds
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this series track?
A: Changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bond lending.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They indicate potential friction and risk in financial market transactions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The survey is conducted quarterly to capture market trends.
Q: Who uses this information?
A: Risk managers, regulators, and financial market analysts assess transaction dynamics.
Q: What are the data's limitations?
A: Survey-based data reflects institutional perceptions at a specific point in time.
Related Trends
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51FISNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ62B1TSNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ79BDCNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| G. Consumer Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79GISNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37B12MINR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ52A2ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Bond Lending Disputes (SFQ78BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.