79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ79BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insights into market friction and dispute resolution.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This indicator tracks how frequently and how long disputes occur in high-yield bond lending. It reflects market efficiency and operational challenges.

Methodology

Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute characteristics.

Historical Context

Used by regulators and market participants to assess lending market smoothness.

Key Facts

  • Focuses on high-yield corporate bond lending
  • Quarterly survey-based metric
  • Indicates market operational efficiency

FAQs

Q: What are mark and collateral disputes?

A: Disputes arise from disagreements about asset valuation or collateral terms in bond lending.

Q: Why track dispute duration?

A: Longer disputes indicate market inefficiencies and potential systemic risks.

Q: How often is this data collected?

A: The survey captures quarterly changes in dispute characteristics.

Q: What does a decrease in disputes mean?

A: Fewer and shorter disputes suggest improved market processes and reduced friction.

Q: Who benefits from this information?

A: Regulators, bond traders, and risk managers use this to understand market dynamics.

Related Trends

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ19B23MINR

48) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Trs Referencing Non-Securities (Such as Bank Loans, Including, for Example, Commercial and Industrial Loans and Mortgage Whole Loans) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ48BRBUNR

23) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Insurance Companies as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

CTQ23RBUNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Fx. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ51AISNR

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| G. Consumer Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ79GISNR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ25B73MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Dispute Characteristics (ALLQ79BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.