69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ69RBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
13.00
Year-over-Year Change
-18.75%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks liquidity and functioning in the non-agency Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) market. Provides insight into mortgage market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures stability of non-agency RMBS market performance. It helps assess mortgage market liquidity and investor sentiment.
Methodology
Collected through periodic market surveys and financial institution reports.
Historical Context
Used by investors and regulators to understand mortgage market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates non-agency mortgage market stability
- Quarterly assessment of market conditions
- Important for housing finance analysis
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Residential mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises.
Q: Why track RMBS market functioning?
A: Provides insights into mortgage market health and potential economic risks.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' mean?
A: Suggests stable market conditions with no significant liquidity or functional shifts.
Q: Who monitors these market conditions?
A: Investors, financial analysts, and regulatory bodies track RMBS market performance.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically measured and reported on a quarterly basis.
Related Trends
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51FISNR
20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ20DSNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ06B6MINR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ43ARBUNR
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ07ISNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37A63MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market (SFQ69RBUNR), retrieved from FRED.