59) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Yield Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
SFQ59TNNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks the liquidity and functioning of high-yield corporate bond markets. Provides critical insight into financial market stress and credit market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures changes in corporate bond market dynamics. It helps economists assess potential financial system risks and market sentiment.
Methodology
Collected through Federal Reserve survey of financial market participants and institutions.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers to monitor potential credit market disruptions.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate bond market stress levels
- Critical for understanding credit market conditions
- Reflects financial institution perspectives
FAQs
Q: What does a deterioration in high-yield bond market liquidity mean?
A: It suggests increased market stress and potential challenges in corporate credit availability. Indicates potential economic headwinds.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly through Federal Reserve surveys. Provides timely market condition snapshots.
Q: Why do investors care about high-yield bond market liquidity?
A: It signals potential investment risks and overall corporate financial health. Helps predict potential economic contractions.
Q: Can this indicator predict economic downturns?
A: It can be an early warning sign of potential financial market stress. Not a definitive predictor, but valuable diagnostic tool.
Q: How do market participants use this data?
A: Used for risk assessment, investment strategy, and understanding broader market conditions.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ78ARBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A1ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37A33MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ74B3TSNR
8) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ08RBUNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| D. Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ78DDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Corporate Bond Market Liquidity (SFQ59TNNR), retrieved from FRED.