51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ51FICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks significant increases in mark and collateral disputes for commodity contracts. Provides critical insights into commodity market transaction challenges.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures dispute duration and persistence in commodity contract settlements. It reveals potential market friction and transactional complexity.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial and commodity market institutions.
Historical Context
Used by commodity traders and market regulators to assess settlement risks.
Key Facts
- Indicates substantial increase in commodity contract disputes
- Reflects significant market transaction challenges
- Critical for risk assessment in commodity trading
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?
A: Suggests a significant rise in dispute complexity for commodity contracts over three months.
Q: Why are commodity contract disputes important?
A: They signal potential systemic risks and transaction challenges in commodity markets.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Quarterly surveys track changes in dispute characteristics.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Commodity traders, risk managers, and market regulators use this information.
Q: What implications do these disputes have?
A: They can indicate increased market volatility and potential settlement risks.
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37B42MINR
49) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Posting of Nonstandard Collateral (That is, Other Than Cash and U.S. Treasury Securities) as Permitted Under Relevant Agreements Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ49ISNR
55) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Grade Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
ALLQ55TNNR
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ45AISNR
38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ38DSNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A12MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Dispute Duration (OTCDQ51FICNR), retrieved from FRED.