51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ51DICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks significant increases in mark and collateral disputes for corporate credit contracts. Indicates potential heightened market tensions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures the duration and persistence of contractual disputes in corporate credit markets. Signals potential financial stress or complexity.
Methodology
Surveyed data from financial institutions tracking corporate contract dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
Used by analysts to assess corporate credit market dynamics and potential risks.
Key Facts
- Indicates increased corporate contract disputes
- Signals potential market complexity
- Reflects corporate credit market dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?
A: Significant rise in duration and persistence of corporate credit contract disputes.
Q: Why are corporate credit disputes important?
A: They can indicate market stress, financial complexity, and potential economic challenges.
Q: How might increased disputes impact markets?
A: Can signal higher transaction costs, reduced market efficiency, and potential credit market tensions.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Financial regulators, credit analysts, and economic researchers track these indicators.
Q: What causes increased contract disputes?
A: Market volatility, economic uncertainty, and complex financial instruments can contribute.
Related Trends
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51EDSNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ52B1ESNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ56A4ESNR
23) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Insurance Companies as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ23ESNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ06A6MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ66A4ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Credit Referencing Corporates (OTCDQ51DICNR), retrieved from FRED.