39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ39GICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures volume changes in mark and collateral disputes with nonfinancial corporations. Provides critical insights into corporate financial interactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute volumes between financial institutions and nonfinancial corporate entities. It reveals potential transactional challenges.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial and corporate sector participants.
Historical Context
Used to assess corporate financial transaction complexity and potential market friction.
Key Facts
- Indicates increased dispute volume with corporations
- Reflects potential transactional complexity
- Important market interaction metric
FAQs
Q: What does 'Increased Considerably' mean?
A: Significant rise in mark and collateral dispute volumes with nonfinancial corporations compared to previous periods.
Q: Why are these corporate dispute metrics important?
A: They provide insights into financial transaction challenges and potential market friction points.
Q: How might increased disputes impact markets?
A: Can signal potential inefficiencies, increased transaction costs, and complex financial interactions.
Q: Who monitors these dispute volumes?
A: Financial regulators, corporate finance analysts, and market researchers track these indicators.
Q: What factors might cause dispute increases?
A: Complex financial regulations, market volatility, and changing transaction standards can contribute.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ56B2RBUNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ21DISNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ62A4RBUNR
72) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of CMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ72ICNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ43BRBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ66B1TSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Nonfinancial Corporate Disputes (CTQ39GICNR), retrieved from FRED.