39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading REITs. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ39CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures dispute volume specifically for trading REITs over three-month periods. Provides granular insights into financial transaction challenges.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This specific economic indicator focuses on collateral and mark disputes in trading REIT environments. Helps identify sector-specific transactional friction.
Methodology
Surveyed through financial institution reporting mechanisms.
Historical Context
Critical for understanding real estate investment market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Highlights specific trading REIT dispute patterns
- Reveals potential negotiation challenges
- Indicates market interaction complexities
FAQs
Q: What distinguishes this indicator from other REIT metrics?
A: Focuses specifically on trading REIT dispute volumes and changes over three-month periods.
Q: How can investors use this data?
A: Assess potential market friction and transactional challenges in REIT trading environments.
Q: What triggers these disputes?
A: Valuation differences, collateral interpretations, and complex financial instrument negotiations.
Q: Is an increase in disputes negative?
A: Not necessarily. It can indicate market complexity and rigorous financial assessment.
Q: How reliable is this economic indicator?
A: Derived from systematic financial institution reporting with standardized measurement protocols.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56B2TCNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ52A4RBUNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ22ICNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ31A5MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A2ESNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ50EDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Trading REIT Disputes (CTQ39CICNR), retrieved from FRED.