39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39BDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes with hedge fund clients. Provides insight into financial market friction and institutional risk management.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures the frequency and intensity of disputes between financial institutions and hedge fund clients regarding financial transactions and valuations.
Methodology
Data collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions' reporting practices.
Historical Context
Used to assess financial market stability and inter-institutional relationship dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates potential friction in financial transactions
- Reflects institutional risk management practices
- Quarterly measurement of dispute trends
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients over three-month periods.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They reveal potential risks and friction in financial market interactions between institutions and hedge funds.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: What does 'Decreased Somewhat' indicate?
A: Suggests a moderate reduction in dispute volumes compared to previous reporting periods.
Q: Can this data predict market trends?
A: Provides insights into institutional risk management and potential market tensions.
Related News

Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...

S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...

U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...

U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...

U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...

U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Fx Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ42ARBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37B73MINR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency RMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ68RBUNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
SFQ54DSNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ70A2TCNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ13B7MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39BDSNR), retrieved from FRED.