38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably

CTQ38ICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Measures significant increases in nonfinancial corporations' negotiation efforts for more favorable terms. Provides critical insights into corporate strategic positioning.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This indicator tracks substantial changes in corporate negotiation intensity across different business sectors. It reveals strategic corporate responses.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection capturing corporate negotiation intensity levels.

Historical Context

Economists use this to assess corporate strategic behaviors and market pressures.

Key Facts

  • Indicates significant corporate negotiation efforts
  • Reflects intense market competitive pressures
  • Provides strategic economic insights

FAQs

Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean in this context?

A: Indicates a substantial rise in corporate efforts to negotiate more favorable business terms.

Q: How frequently is this data collected?

A: Typically gathered quarterly through comprehensive corporate surveys.

Q: Why track corporate negotiation intensity?

A: To understand market dynamics and corporate strategic responses to economic conditions.

Q: What insights can be drawn from this metric?

A: Reveals corporate adaptability and potential market pressure indicators.

Q: Are there any data collection limitations?

A: Survey-based method may not capture all nuanced corporate negotiation strategies.

Related Trends

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ37B63MINR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ25A13MINR

70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

ALLQ70B2TCNR

61) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Equities (Including Through Stock Loan) by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

SFQ61ISNR

50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. TRS Referencing Non-Securities (Such as Bank Loans, Including, for Example, Commercial and Industrial Loans and Mortgage Whole Loans). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

OTCDQ50GRBUNR

6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ06B7MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (CTQ38ICNR), retrieved from FRED.