Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted

CTQ31A1SINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

1.00

Year-over-Year Change

0.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 10/1/2011

Summary

Tracks the number of survey respondents in a quarterly economic data collection. Provides insight into survey participation and data collection methodology.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

Represents the count of participants in a specific economic survey conducted on a quarterly basis.

Methodology

Counts unique respondents in a non-seasonally adjusted quarterly survey.

Historical Context

Important for understanding survey statistical reliability and representativeness.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly non-seasonally adjusted count
  • Indicates survey participation levels
  • Helps assess data collection quality

FAQs

Q: What does this series measure?

A: The number of participants in a specific economic survey conducted quarterly.

Q: Why track survey respondent numbers?

A: To ensure statistical validity and representativeness of economic data collection.

Q: Is the data seasonally adjusted?

A: No, this series is not seasonally adjusted, showing raw respondent counts.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: The series is updated on a quarterly basis with the latest survey participant count.

Q: What impacts respondent numbers?

A: Survey design, outreach efforts, and economic conditions can influence participation rates.

Related Trends

75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ75DCNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

OTCDQ51DISNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ19B3MINR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ31B32MINR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

OTCDQ51CDCNR

67) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ67ISNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Survey Respondent Count (CTQ31A1SINR), retrieved from FRED.