51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51DISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
-50.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in credit referencing corporate contract dispute persistence. Provides critical insights into corporate credit market interactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks shifts in dispute duration for corporate credit reference contracts. It helps evaluate market communication and resolution processes.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from corporate credit market participants.
Historical Context
Used by financial institutions to understand credit referencing market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Reflects corporate credit market communication efficiency
- Indicates potential transactional complexity
- Signals inter-corporate dispute resolution trends
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator track?
A: Changes in duration and persistence of corporate credit reference contract disputes.
Q: Why are these disputes significant?
A: They reveal communication challenges and efficiency in corporate credit markets.
Q: How is the data gathered?
A: Through quarterly surveys of corporate credit market participants.
Q: Who finds this data useful?
A: Financial institutions, credit analysts, and corporate risk managers.
Q: What does an increase in disputes indicate?
A: Potential growing complexity or communication challenges in corporate credit referencing.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ62B1ESNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ52A4TCNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ70A1ESNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ78ERBUNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31A43MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ51BDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Credit Reference Disputes (OTCDQ51DISNR), retrieved from FRED.