Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted

CTQ19B5NINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 10/1/2011

Summary

Tracks quarterly survey respondent count for economic research. Provides critical insight into data collection and statistical sampling methodology.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This metric represents the total number of participants in quarterly economic surveys. It helps researchers assess data reliability and representativeness.

Methodology

Counted directly from survey participation records during each quarterly research cycle.

Historical Context

Used by economists to validate statistical significance and sampling accuracy.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly tracking of survey participation
  • Indicates research sample size
  • Critical for statistical validity

FAQs

Q: What does this series measure?

A: Tracks the number of participants in quarterly economic surveys. Helps assess data collection quality.

Q: Why are respondent numbers important?

A: Large, diverse samples improve research accuracy and statistical significance of economic studies.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Updated quarterly with each new survey cycle.

Q: Can respondent numbers change?

A: Yes, participation can vary based on research design and participant availability.

Q: How do researchers use this data?

A: To validate survey methodology and ensure representative economic research samples.

Related Trends

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ56B3ECNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ37A7MINR

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

SFQ56A3TSNR

46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

OTCDQ46ARBUNR

40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ40GRBUNR

32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ32DSNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Respondents (CTQ19B5NINR), retrieved from FRED.