19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19A72MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks institutional competition dynamics in mutual fund and investment markets. Measures changes in pricing and non-price terms across financial institutions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend reflects competitive pressures and strategic positioning among financial institutions. It provides insights into market dynamics and institutional behavior.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey responses from financial institutions.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to understand market competitive landscape.
Key Facts
- Tracks competitive dynamics in financial markets
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Reflects institutional pricing strategies
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Measures competitive dynamics among financial institutions in mutual fund and investment markets.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Collected and updated quarterly through institutional surveys.
Q: Why are these competition metrics important?
A: Provides insights into market trends and institutional strategic positioning.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Investors, regulators, and financial analysts track these competitive trends.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: Relies on survey responses, which can have subjective interpretations.
Related News
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Home Sales Decline In August Due To High Prices
August 2023 U.S. Home Sales Decline Amid Rising Mortgage Rates and High Prices In August 2023, U.S. home sales experienced a notable decline, highl...
U.S. Trade Deficit Decreases As Businesses Anticipate Tariff Hikes
U.S. Trade Deficit Reaches Two-Year Low Amid Anticipated Tariff Hikes The recent announcement that the U.S. trade deficit has reached a two-year lo...
U.S. Natural Gas Storage Increases Due to Market Dynamics
Navigating Market Volatility: U.S. Natural Gas Storage Strategies and Trends Understanding the dynamics of the U.S. natural gas storage sector is c...
U.S. GDP Growth to Slow Due to Tariffs and Immigration Policies
How Tariffs and Immigration Policies Influence U.S. GDP Growth in 2025 The U.S. GDP is a fundamental gauge of the country's economic health. Recent...
Related Trends
38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ38ISNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31B43MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ31B52MINR
1) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries (Such as Large Banking Institutions) Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ01RBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ62B2RBUNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Fx. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ50ADCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Institutional Competition Trends (CTQ19A72MINR), retrieved from FRED.