79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. Cmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ79FRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

15.00

Year-over-Year Change

0.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes related to Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) lending over a three-month period. Understanding these disputes is crucial for assessing lending market stability and potential risks in commercial real estate financing.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The trend measures the consistency and resolution of lending disputes in the CMBS market, providing insights into the complexity and friction within commercial real estate financing. Economists use this data to gauge the smoothness of lending processes and potential challenges in collateral valuation.

Methodology

Data is collected through systematic surveying and reporting by financial institutions and regulatory bodies tracking commercial mortgage lending disputes.

Historical Context

This metric helps policymakers and financial regulators understand potential friction points in commercial real estate lending and assess overall market health.

Key Facts

  • Tracks three-month changes in CMBS lending dispute duration
  • Provides insights into commercial real estate lending complexity
  • Indicates potential friction in mortgage-backed securities market

FAQs

Q: What are CMBS lending disputes?

A: CMBS lending disputes involve disagreements about valuation, terms, or collateral in commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions. These can relate to property assessment, loan conditions, or market valuation.

Q: Why do these disputes matter?

A: Disputes can indicate market inefficiencies, potential risks, and challenges in commercial real estate lending. They can slow down transactions and impact overall market liquidity.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: The Federal Reserve typically updates this indicator quarterly, providing a consistent snapshot of lending market conditions over three-month periods.

Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' mean?

A: This suggests that the duration and persistence of CMBS lending disputes have not significantly increased or decreased during the reported period.

Q: Who uses this economic indicator?

A: Financial analysts, real estate investors, regulators, and policymakers use this data to assess commercial lending market health and potential risks.

Related News

Related Trends

46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific Abs or Mbs Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ46BRBUNR

42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

OTCDQ42ADSNR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ31A52MINR

62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

SFQ62B4TCNR

35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

ALLQ35TCNR

13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ13A23MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. Cmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [ALLQ79FRBUNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025