78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| D. Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ78DRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
20.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Monitors volume changes in mark and collateral disputes for Agency RMBS lending. Provides critical insights into mortgage-backed securities market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute levels in Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities lending. It helps assess market stability and transaction smoothness.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking lending dispute volumes.
Historical Context
Used by mortgage investors and regulators to understand market lending conditions.
Key Facts
- Tracks Agency RMBS lending dispute volumes
- Indicates mortgage market transaction stability
- Quarterly assessment of dispute characteristics
FAQs
Q: What does ALLQ78DRBUNR measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for Agency RMBS lending over three months.
Q: Why are RMBS disputes significant?
A: They can reveal potential friction in mortgage-backed securities markets and lending practices.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported quarterly by financial monitoring institutions.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Mortgage investors, regulators, and financial risk analysts use this data.
Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' indicate?
A: Suggests stable dispute levels in Agency RMBS lending during the reporting period.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ74A4ESNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ75RBUNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A22MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19A5MINR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ79EISNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ62A3ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Agency RMBS Lending Disputes (ALLQ78DRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.