78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| C. Equities. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted
ALLQ78CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks the total number of survey respondents in a quarterly economic data collection. Provides insight into survey participation and data collection breadth.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric represents the count of participants in a specific economic survey. It helps assess survey comprehensiveness and representativeness.
Methodology
Quarterly count of participating institutions or individuals in economic research.
Historical Context
Used to validate statistical significance and survey reliability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly non-seasonally adjusted count
- Indicates survey participation levels
- Helps assess data collection comprehensiveness
FAQs
Q: Why track number of respondents?
A: Helps researchers assess survey statistical validity and potential sampling bias.
Q: How does respondent count impact research?
A: More respondents generally increase data reliability and representativeness of economic trends.
Q: Is this data seasonally adjusted?
A: No, this is a non-seasonally adjusted quarterly count of survey participants.
Q: What types of surveys use this metric?
A: Economic, financial, and policy research surveys across various institutional contexts.
Q: How frequently is this updated?
A: Data is collected and reported on a quarterly basis.
Related Trends
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ52B4TCNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19B42MINR
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ07ICNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ51ERBUNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ56A3ESNR
71) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of CMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ71DCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Survey Respondent Count (ALLQ78CICNR), retrieved from FRED.