78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ78BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bond lending. Provides critical insight into financial market friction and institutional lending practices.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures the volume of disputes in high-yield corporate bond lending transactions. It reflects potential challenges in complex financial market interactions.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators to monitor potential risks in corporate bond lending markets.
Key Facts
- Quarterly dispute volume metric
- Focuses on high-yield corporate bonds
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this series track?
A: It measures changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bond lending.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: Disputes can indicate friction, risk, or complexity in financial market transactions.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: The series is updated quarterly through institutional surveys.
Q: What do dispute changes suggest?
A: Increased disputes might signal market stress or changing lending practices.
Q: Who monitors this data?
A: Regulators, risk managers, and financial analysts use this to assess market conditions.
Related Trends
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
SFQ78ADSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37B33MINR
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ07RBUNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ74B4TCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37B12MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51EICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ78BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.