65) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
ALLQ65MONR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
3.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks liquidity and functioning in agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market. Provides key insights into government-backed mortgage securities performance.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures changes in market dynamics for agency RMBS, reflecting market health and investor sentiment in government-supported mortgage securities.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial market participants and institutional investors quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess mortgage market stability and risk.
Key Facts
- Quarterly assessment of agency RMBS market
- Focuses on government-backed mortgage securities
- Indicates market sentiment and risk perception
FAQs
Q: What are agency RMBS?
A: Mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why track agency RMBS market liquidity?
A: Provides insights into mortgage lending health and government-backed securities performance.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Quarterly survey providing current market condition assessments.
Q: Who uses this market liquidity data?
A: Investors, financial analysts, regulators, and economic policymakers monitor these trends.
Q: What does 'improved somewhat' indicate?
A: Suggests slight enhancement in market trading efficiency and investor confidence.
Related Trends
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ51DICNR
34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ34DCNR
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ45BRBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ62B1TCNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ50DICNR
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ45BDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Agency RMBS Market Liquidity (ALLQ65MONR), retrieved from FRED.