53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ53ICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in demand for high-grade corporate bond funding. Provides critical insight into corporate debt market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks institutional perspectives on corporate bond funding demand. Reflects broader market liquidity and investment trends.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions' market observations.
Historical Context
Used to assess corporate debt market conditions and investor sentiment.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate bond market trends
- Reflects institutional investment perspectives
- Part of quarterly market assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in institutional demand for high-grade corporate bond funding. Reflects market liquidity.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Updated quarterly through comprehensive financial institution surveys.
Q: Why are corporate bond funding trends important?
A: Indicates corporate financing conditions and broader economic investment sentiment.
Q: What impacts corporate bond demand?
A: Interest rates, economic outlook, and institutional investment strategies influence demand.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Represents surveyed perceptions, not actual bond issuance or transaction volumes.
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ40ARBUNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ78ADCNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| B. Etfs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ21BISNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25A32MINR
32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ32ISNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ43BICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Bond Funding Demand (ALLQ53ICNR), retrieved from FRED.