51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51FICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes for commodity contracts. Provides critical insights into commodity market transaction challenges.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator evaluates dispute duration and persistence in commodity contract settlements. It helps understand market friction in commodity trading.
Methodology
Data gathered through comprehensive surveys of financial and commodity trading institutions.
Historical Context
Used by commodity traders and market regulators to assess transaction reliability.
Key Facts
- Indicates significant increase in commodity contract disputes
- Reflects potential market transaction challenges
- Important for risk assessment in commodity trading
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?
A: Suggests a substantial rise in dispute complexity for commodity contracts.
Q: Why track commodity contract disputes?
A: Helps understand market friction and potential risks in commodity trading.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: Typically updated quarterly through industry-wide surveys.
Q: Who benefits from this economic indicator?
A: Commodity traders, risk managers, and market regulators use this data.
Q: What implications does this have for traders?
A: Signals increased complexity and potential higher transaction risks in commodity markets.
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ40FICNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B23MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ74A4RBUNR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ11TSNR
59) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Yield Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
SFQ59TNNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ70B1ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (ALLQ51FICNR), retrieved from FRED.