51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51FICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes for commodity contracts. Provides critical insights into commodity market transaction challenges.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator evaluates dispute duration and persistence in commodity contract settlements. It helps understand market friction in commodity trading.
Methodology
Data gathered through comprehensive surveys of financial and commodity trading institutions.
Historical Context
Used by commodity traders and market regulators to assess transaction reliability.
Key Facts
- Indicates significant increase in commodity contract disputes
- Reflects potential market transaction challenges
- Important for risk assessment in commodity trading
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?
A: Suggests a substantial rise in dispute complexity for commodity contracts.
Q: Why track commodity contract disputes?
A: Helps understand market friction and potential risks in commodity trading.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: Typically updated quarterly through industry-wide surveys.
Q: Who benefits from this economic indicator?
A: Commodity traders, risk managers, and market regulators use this data.
Q: What implications does this have for traders?
A: Signals increased complexity and potential higher transaction risks in commodity markets.
Related Trends
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ70A2ECNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39DDCNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
ALLQ69PNNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37B12MINR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ06B2MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ66A3ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (ALLQ51FICNR), retrieved from FRED.