51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ51EDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of contract disputes for securitized financial products. Provides insight into financial market stability.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures dispute resolution trends in credit referencing and securitized products. Indicates market friction and contractual complexity.
Methodology
Collected through survey of financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators to assess financial market transparency and contract management.
Key Facts
- Tracks financial contract dispute trends
- Focuses on MBS and ABS markets
- Indicates market friction levels
FAQs
Q: What types of products are covered?
A: Includes mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS). Tracks contract dispute trends.
Q: Why are these dispute measurements important?
A: They reveal market efficiency and potential systemic risks in financial markets.
Q: How do these disputes impact investors?
A: Increased disputes can signal market uncertainty and potential investment risks.
Q: How frequently are these tracked?
A: Measured quarterly to provide ongoing market condition insights.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes indicate?
A: Suggests improving market clarity and more standardized contract terms.
Related Trends
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ52B2TCNR
46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ46BICNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading REITs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39CDCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ74A4RBUNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ31A32MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ37B6MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Securitized Product Contract Disputes (ALLQ51EDSNR), retrieved from FRED.