51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ51CDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts. Provides insights into market transaction complexity.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This trend tracks dispute characteristics in equity contract settlements. It reflects potential friction in financial markets.

Methodology

Surveyed through financial institutions reporting contract dispute trends.

Historical Context

Used by regulators to monitor market transaction efficiency.

Key Facts

  • Indicates complexity of equity contract settlements
  • Reflects market transaction efficiency
  • Important for regulatory oversight

FAQs

Q: What does 'decreased considerably' mean?

A: Significant reduction in duration and persistence of equity contract disputes.

Q: Why track contract disputes?

A: Helps understand market efficiency and potential transaction challenges.

Q: How often are these disputes measured?

A: Reported quarterly with three-month retrospective analysis.

Q: What impacts dispute frequency?

A: Market conditions, regulatory environment, and transaction complexity.

Q: Who uses this data?

A: Regulators, financial analysts, and market researchers monitor these trends.

Related News

Related Trends

66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ66B4RBUNR

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ39FISNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ37A52MINR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

SFQ74A2RBUNR

40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ40FICNR

34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

CTQ34RBUNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Equity Contract Disputes (ALLQ51CDCNR), retrieved from FRED.