50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Trs Referencing Non-Securities (Such as Bank Loans, Including, for Example, Commercial and Industrial Loans and Mortgage Whole Loans). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ50GRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
13.00
Year-over-Year Change
8.33%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Monitors changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes for non-securities contracts like bank loans. Provides insights into financial transaction complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute volumes in non-securities financial contracts. Helps understand transactional risks in lending markets.
Methodology
Collected through Federal Reserve survey of financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used to assess potential friction in loan and financial contract markets.
Key Facts
- Tracks disputes in commercial and industrial loans
- Indicates potential transactional complexity
- Reflects market negotiation dynamics
FAQs
Q: What types of contracts are included?
A: Includes bank loans like commercial and industrial loans, and whole mortgage loans. Excludes securities-based contracts.
Q: Why track mark and collateral disputes?
A: Disputes can indicate market stress, negotiation challenges, or changing risk perceptions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Surveyed quarterly, providing periodic snapshot of contract dispute landscape.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' indicate?
A: Suggests stable dispute volumes and consistent contract negotiation patterns.
Q: Who monitors these dispute volumes?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals use this data.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
65) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
SFQ65MONR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ06B73MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51FDSNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19A72MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39EISNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ40BDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Securities Contract Disputes (ALLQ50GRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.