50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ50EICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
This economic trend measures changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes relating to credit referencing securitized products, including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS). It provides insight into market volatility and risk in the securitized products sector.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The Federal Reserve's 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?' survey tracks changes in dispute volume for various financial instrument types. The 'E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS' component is a key indicator of stress and uncertainty in the securitized products market.
Methodology
The data is collected through a quarterly survey of market participants.
Historical Context
This trend is used by policymakers and analysts to assess market conditions and risks in the securitized products industry.
Key Facts
- The trend measures dispute volume in securitized products.
- It provides insight into market volatility and risk.
- The data is collected through a quarterly Federal Reserve survey.
FAQs
Q: What does this economic trend measure?
A: This trend measures changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes relating to credit referencing securitized products, including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS).
Q: Why is this trend relevant for users or analysts?
A: This trend provides insight into market volatility and risk in the securitized products sector, which is important for policymakers and analysts assessing conditions in this market.
Q: How is this data collected or calculated?
A: The data is collected through a quarterly survey of market participants conducted by the Federal Reserve.
Q: How is this trend used in economic policy?
A: This trend is used by policymakers and analysts to assess market conditions and risks in the securitized products industry, which can inform policy decisions.
Q: Are there update delays or limitations?
A: The data is released quarterly, so there may be a delay in the most recent information. Additionally, the survey's coverage may not capture all market activity.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19B52MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ31A4MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ74A1TCNR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading Reits as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ11TCNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19A6MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74B3ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed? | E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably' (ALLQ50EICNR), retrieved from FRED.