78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ78BICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insight into potential market tensions and trading complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures dispute volumes in high-yield corporate bond markets. It helps assess market friction and potential trading challenges.
Methodology
Collected through survey-based assessment of financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used by traders, risk managers, and financial regulators to monitor market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates potential increased market complexity
- Reflects challenges in high-yield bond trading
- Signals potential increased market uncertainty
FAQs
Q: What are mark and collateral disputes?
A: Disagreements about bond valuations or collateral terms between trading parties.
Q: Why do disputes matter in bond markets?
A: Can indicate market stress, valuation challenges, and potential trading difficulties.
Q: How often are these disputes tracked?
A: Typically monitored quarterly by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.
Q: What causes increased dispute volumes?
A: Market volatility, economic uncertainty, and complex bond structures can increase disputes.
Q: How do these disputes impact investors?
A: Can create additional transaction costs and potential delays in bond trading.
Related Trends
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading Reits as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ11ESNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ52A2RBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66B4RBUNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ50DISNR
10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ10ICNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37A23MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Corporate Bond Disputes (ALLQ78BICNR), retrieved from FRED.