39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ39FICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

-100.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Monitors changes in mark and collateral disputes for separately managed accounts with investment advisers. Provides critical insights into financial account management.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This trend tracks dispute volume in separately managed investment accounts. It reflects potential challenges in financial account administration.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection tracking dispute frequency in investment accounts.

Historical Context

Used by financial regulators and investment professionals to assess account management risks.

Key Facts

  • Tracks quarterly dispute volume changes
  • Focuses on separately managed accounts
  • Indicates potential account management challenges

FAQs

Q: What are mark and collateral disputes?

A: Disagreements about account valuation and collateral terms in investment accounts.

Q: Why track these disputes?

A: They reveal potential risks and challenges in investment account management.

Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?

A: Indicates a significant rise in dispute volume during the reporting period.

Q: Who uses this data?

A: Investment advisers, regulators, and financial risk managers analyze these trends.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: Typically updated quarterly to reflect current market conditions.

Related News

Related Trends

53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ53RBUNR

10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ10DSNR

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ56B4ECNR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ25B52MINR

9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ09ICNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ37B32MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Investment Account Disputes (ALLQ39FICNR), retrieved from FRED.
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably | US Economic Trends