39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39EISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume with insurance companies. Provides insight into financial sector conflict dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures dispute frequency and intensity in financial interactions with insurance companies. Helps assess market friction and relationship quality.
Methodology
Collected through periodic financial sector surveys and reporting mechanisms.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial institutions to monitor market interaction tensions.
Key Facts
- Indicates financial sector dispute trends
- Measures insurance company interaction quality
- Signals potential market friction points
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks volume changes in mark and collateral disputes with insurance companies over three months.
Q: Why are these dispute metrics important?
A: They reveal potential tensions and communication challenges in financial sector interactions.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly through financial sector surveys.
Q: What can rising dispute volumes indicate?
A: Potential increased complexity or disagreement in financial transactions and valuations.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Related Trends
32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ32RBUNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ56A2TCNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19B5MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ66A4TCNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ09DCNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ66A1TSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ39EISNR), retrieved from FRED.