39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ39CRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
15.00
Year-over-Year Change
-6.25%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes for trading REITs. Provides insight into market transaction complexity and potential friction.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures the stability of trading REIT transaction processes and potential dispute levels. Indicates market operational efficiency.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses about changes in client dispute volumes.
Historical Context
Used by financial institutions to monitor market transaction smoothness.
Key Facts
- Indicates transaction market stability
- Reflects operational efficiency
- Important for market transparency
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes for trading REITs.
Q: Why are dispute volumes important?
A: They indicate market transaction smoothness and potential operational challenges.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically gathered through quarterly institutional surveys.
Q: Who finds this data useful?
A: Financial analysts, regulators, and REIT market participants use this information.
Q: What can unchanged dispute volumes suggest?
A: Stability in transaction processes and consistent market operational practices.
Related Trends
1) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries (Such as Large Banking Institutions) Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ01ICNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ54ICNR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
CTQ11ESNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51DICNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ09ISNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37B42MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, REIT Trading Dispute Volume (ALLQ39CRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.