39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ39BICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

-100.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge funds over a three-month period. The metric provides insight into financial market tensions and potential systemic risks in alternative investment sectors.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The trend measures the volume of disputes between financial institutions and hedge funds regarding mark-to-market valuations and collateral requirements. Economists use this data to assess financial market stress and potential liquidity challenges in the hedge fund ecosystem.

Methodology

Data is likely collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions and regulatory bodies tracking hedge fund interactions.

Historical Context

This indicator helps policymakers and risk managers understand potential volatility and dispute dynamics in alternative investment markets.

Key Facts

  • Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes with hedge funds
  • Provides insight into financial market tensions
  • Helps assess potential systemic risks in alternative investments

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator measure?

A: It measures the volume of mark and collateral disputes between financial institutions and hedge funds over a three-month period.

Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?

A: These disputes can signal potential financial stress, liquidity challenges, and market volatility in the hedge fund sector.

Q: How is this data collected?

A: The data is likely gathered through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions and regulatory bodies.

Q: Who uses this economic indicator?

A: Policymakers, risk managers, financial analysts, and investors use this data to assess market conditions and potential risks.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: The indicator appears to be tracked on a quarterly basis, providing a periodic snapshot of market dynamics.

Related News

Related Trends

34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ34ICNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ37B32MINR

9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ09DCNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

CTQ19B33MINR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ19B53MINR

21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

CTQ21DDSNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably [ALLQ39BICNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably | US Economic Trends